Skip to content
GT
🎯 Science-Based Targets (SBTi)
Back to course
Setting Your TargetsLesson 3 of 33 min readNet-Zero Standard V1.3, Section 4.7; Near-Term Criteria V5.3, C25-C28

Target Wording, Communication, and Validation

Executing flawless corporate climate math is entirely useless if the official target language is vague, legally slippery, or greenwashed. The SBTi brutally audits public target language, severely rejects non-compliant phrasing, and legally binds the corporation to continuous aggressive public reporting.

The Four Mandatory Grammar Pillars

An officially compliant SBTi target statement absolutely must lock down four uncompromising variables:

  1. Base Year: The unmovable historical anchor.
  2. Target Year: The unforgiving future deadline.
  3. Scope Coverage: Exactly which scopes (and Scope 3 categories) are trapped inside the target.
  4. Percentage Reduction: The mathematically brutal absolute or intensity cut.

Shattering Poor Target Language Invalid: "GlobalCo will fiercely reduce its massive carbon footprint before 2030." (Instant failure. Missing scope, missing base year, missing rigorous percentage).

Invalid: "We are incredibly proud to aim to halve our operation emissions by 2035." (Instant failure. "Operations" is dangerously vague, missing base year, 50% may mathematically violate the 1.5C minimum depending on the base year).

Flawless: "Acme Manufacturing commits to reduce absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions physically by 46.2% by 2030, originating from a 2019 base year, completely aligned with a 1.5C pathway."

Net-Zero Target Language: No "Carbon Neutral" Fakes

When constructing language for the ultimate 2050 Net-Zero Standard, companies frequently attempt to sneak in "carbon neutral" phrasing to legally justify buying cheap offsets. The SBTi violently shreds these attempts.

A fully legitimate Net-Zero statement absolutely must enforce a deeply agonizing sequencing:

  1. It must explicitly declare a massive 90% absolute physical reduction across all required scopes.
  2. It must explicitly restrict neutralisation (via highly expensive permanent carbon removals) strictly to the final residual 10% of the footprint.

A company absolutely cannot blur these lines. Target statements claiming "we will be net-zero by aggressively expanding our forestry offset portfolio" will be violently rejected. Offsets absolutely never legally substitute for the 90% operational reduction mandate.

The SBTi Validation Gauntlet

Submitting a massive corporate target is not an administrative formality; it is a brutal technical audit.

  1. Submit: The company pushes hundreds of pages of raw data, target-setting workbooks, and GHG Protocol mapping to the SBTi.
  2. The Audit: Elite SBTi technical assessors hunt down loopholes. They will actively reject submissions if the Scope 3 footprint looks suspiciously tiny, or if the company attempted to use an intensity method to dodge absolute cuts.
  3. The 6-Month Mandate (C28): Once validated, the company absolutely cannot hide the target. Criterion C28 mandates that the approved targets must be loudly published to the world within exactly 6 months.

Ongoing Reporting Execution (C25)

Securing approval merely triggers the next phase of accountability. Criterion C25 violently mandates that the massive corporation comprehensively reports its inventory and exact target progress every single year.

The SBTi aggressively strongly recommends dumping this incredibly detailed data directly into the CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project). This annual requirement prevents a corporation from generating massive PR upon target validation, secretly missing every milestone for a decade, and hoping Wall Street forgets the commitment.

The Mandatory 5-Year Review (C26)

Corporations mutate continually. They acquire massive competitors, spin off massive divisions, and alter supply chains. Criterion C26 absolutely prevents targets from becoming obsolete legacy documents.

Every validated company globally must execute a massively intensive technical review at least every 5 years. If the company footprint has violently shifted, or if the SBTi has published terrifyingly stricter climate science, the company is legally forced to entirely rebuild, recalculate, and resubmit its targets to maintain validation.

Key Takeaways

  • 1A compliant target statement must specify four elements: base year, target year, scope coverage, and percentage reduction
  • 2Net-zero target language must explicitly declare 90% operational reduction and restrict neutralization to the final 10% via permanent removals
  • 3Validated targets must be publicly announced within 6 months of approval (C28) - delays risk delisting
  • 4Annual public reporting of GHG inventory and target progress is mandatory (C25), preferably through CDP
  • 5Every validated target must undergo a full technical review at least every 5 years (C26) and be updated to the latest SBTi science

Knowledge Check

1.Which of the following near-term target statements is compliant with SBTi requirements?

2.Criterion C25 of the Near-Term Criteria requires companies with approved SBTi targets to:

3.Under Criterion C28, once the SBTi has approved a company's targets, the company must publicly announce those targets within how many months?

4.The SBTi's Corporate Net-Zero Standard requires that before a company can neutralise residual emissions to claim net-zero, it must first achieve at least what level of absolute reduction across all scopes?

5.Criterion C26 mandates that companies with approved SBTi targets must conduct a formal review of those targets at what frequency?

3 of 3