Skip to content
GT
๐ŸŒก๏ธ IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures
Financial Effects and Climate ResilienceLesson 1 of 44 min readIFRS S2 Paragraphs 15-21

Current and Anticipated Financial Effects

Financial effects are where climate risk meets the balance sheet. IFRS S2 requires both current and anticipated financial effects, creating one of the most demanding, and most valuable, elements of the standard. This lesson covers what must be disclosed and the tools available to prepare these disclosures.

The Dual Requirement: Current and Anticipated

Paragraph 15 establishes two complementary disclosure requirements:

  • (a) Current financial effects: How climate-related risks and opportunities have affected the entity's financial position, performance, and cash flows in the current reporting period
  • (b) Anticipated financial effects: How climate-related risks and opportunities are expected to affect the entity's financial position, performance, and cash flows in the short, medium, and long term

This dual structure is deliberate. Current effects provide verifiable, audited information. Anticipated effects require forward-looking judgment but are often the more important information for investors making long-term decisions.

Current Financial Effects (Para 16)

Paragraph 16 requires quantitative and qualitative information in four areas:

  • (a) How climate risks and opportunities have affected financial position, performance, and cash flows. For example, has storm damage impaired assets? Has carbon pricing increased operating costs? Have new green products generated premium revenues?
  • (b) Risks with significant potential for material adjustment. Any climate-related risk that could realistically force a significant change to the recorded book value of an asset or liability within the next annual reporting period must be disclosed. This mirrors the requirements for significant estimation uncertainty in financial reporting.
  • (c) How financial position is expected to change. Investment and disposal plans driven by climate considerations, funding sources for climate investments, and changes in the entity's capital structure.
  • (d) How financial performance and cash flows are expected to change. Revenue opportunities from new products, cost impacts from carbon pricing or energy transition, changes in depreciation from accelerated asset retirement.
Financial Statement AreaClimate Impact Examples
Assets (balance sheet)Impairment of fossil fuel assets; write-down of flood-damaged facilities; stranded asset recognition
Liabilities (balance sheet)Carbon credit obligations; environmental remediation provisions; climate litigation claims
Revenue (P&L)Lost revenue from disrupted operations; premium revenue from low-carbon products; carbon credit sales
Operating costs (P&L)Increased energy costs from transition; carbon taxes; higher insurance premiums
Capital expenditure (cash flow)Investment in renewable energy; facility upgrades for climate resilience; electrification of fleet
Financing (cash flow)Green bonds issued; sustainability-linked loan terms; climate risk adjustments to credit facility

Quantitative or Qualitative? (Para 17 to 18)

IFRS S2 paragraph 17 allows entities to disclose a single amount or a range when disclosing anticipated financial effects. A range acknowledges the inherent uncertainty in forward-looking climate estimates and is often more honest than a point estimate.

Paragraph 18 reinforces the proportionality principle: entities use all reasonable and supportable information and apply an approach commensurate with their circumstances. A small regional company with limited financial modelling capability can apply a simpler approach than a global bank with sophisticated risk modelling teams.

Exemptions from Quantitative Disclosure (Para 19 to 20)

Two exemptions from providing quantitative information about anticipated financial effects are available:

Para 19 (Information not useful):

  • (a) The financial effects are not separately identifiable. For example, if climate is one of many factors affecting revenue and cannot be reliably disaggregated.
  • (b) Measurement uncertainty is so high that quantitative information would not be useful to users.

Para 20 (Capability gap):

The entity lacks the skills, capabilities, or resources to produce quantitative estimates at the current time. Para 20 is a temporary relief that acknowledges many entities are building their climate financial modelling capabilities. It is not a permanent exemption.

What Must Be Disclosed If Exemptions Are Used (Para 21)

Using an exemption from quantitative disclosure does not mean providing nothing. Paragraph 21 requires:

  • (a) Explanation: Why quantitative information is not being provided
  • (b) Qualitative information: Identification of which specific line items, totals, or subtotals in the financial statements are affected by climate risks and opportunities
  • (c) Combined quantitative information: The combined financial effects across all climate risks and opportunities, unless this too is not useful

The financial effects disclosures work like a bridge between the sustainability report and the financial statements. Before IFRS S2, climate information and financial information lived in separate documents with no connection. IFRS S2 requires entities to show exactly which line items in the accounts are affected by climate risks, turning sustainability risk into financial risk in the eyes of investors.

Example: A coastal real estate developer discloses anticipated financial effects:

Current effects: "In 2024, storm damage to two properties resulted in asset impairments of 12 million GBP. Insurance recoveries of 8 million GBP were recognised. Net P&L impact: 4 million GBP."

Anticipated effects (medium term): "Based on IPCC RCP 4.5 projections for our operating geography, we estimate 15 to 25% of our portfolio by book value (180 to 300 million GBP) faces a moderate-to-high probability of recurring flood damage within 10 years. We disclose a range rather than a point estimate given uncertainty in local sea level projections. This represents the key climate-related risk with potential for material adjustment to asset carrying values."

Quantitative note: "Our estimates are based on third-party coastal flood mapping applied to our property portfolio. We use a base case of 0.5m sea level rise by 2035 and a high case of 0.8m."

Key Takeaways

  • 1IFRS S2 requires both current financial effects (verifiable, audited) and anticipated financial effects (forward-looking, often more important for investors)
  • 2Current effects must cover four areas: impact on financial position and performance, risks with potential for material adjustment, expected changes to financial position, and expected changes to cash flows
  • 3Anticipated financial effects can be disclosed as a single amount or a range - ranges are often more honest given inherent climate uncertainty
  • 4Two exemptions exist: effects not separately identifiable or measurement uncertainty too high (Para 19), or the entity lacks skills and resources (Para 20)
  • 5Even when using exemptions, entities must identify which specific financial statement line items are affected and provide combined quantitative information where possible

Knowledge Check

1.IFRS S2 paragraph 15 requires disclosure of both current and anticipated financial effects. What is the key difference between them?

2.Which financial statement area would most directly show the impact of a severe flood damaging a manufacturing facility?

3.IFRS S2 paragraph 17 says entities 'may disclose a single amount or a range' for anticipated financial effects. When might a range be more appropriate than a single figure?

4.Which of the following climate events would create a 'significant risk of material adjustment within the next annual reporting period' (Para 16(b))?